Answer:
Their punishment should be ten to twenty-five years in prison with chance of parole because of the circumstances they were in.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
The most frequently used disposition in juvenile courts is ________.
Answer:
Hello.
The most frequently used disposition in juvenile courts are Probation followed by Placement.
________ is when bureaucrats attempt to translate laws into specific rules and actions.
Implementation is when bureaucrats attempt to translate laws into specific rules and actions.
Who are Bureaucrats?A member of a bureaucracy is referred to as a bureaucrat. This may refer to a member of the board of directors of a corporation or other organization, the chief executive officer of a government agency, or another person in a position of authority.
Finally, some examples of traditional bureaucrats include tax collectors, government accountants, police officers, firefighters, and members of the armed forces. They have the responsibility of translating already passed laws into detailed guidelines and procedures.
Learn more about bureaucrats here: https://brainly.com/question/27425468
#SPJ1
Keeping a city clean is not only a responsibility of the local civic body but also of the citizens. Mention any two ways in which we can contribute to keep our city clean. *
Answer:
One way we can contribute to keep our city clean is to podcast how dirty and filthy our society is, in that way the goverment will do somethings about it, but since we should keep our own path clean maybe consider cleaning up things you see when you go out.
I hope this helps.
: flr-23 florida law states that a boater under 21 years of age cannot legally operate a boat if he or she has a breath alcohol concentration (bac) of what minimum amount or higher?
Answer:
Florida law states that a boater under 21 years of age cannot legally operate a boat if he or she has a breath alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.02 or higher. This is a zero-tolerance policy for underage boaters who operate a vessel while under the influence of alcohol. It is also illegal for any person to operate a vessel with a BAC of 0.08 or higher in Florida.
A growing number of law enforcement dispatchers and officers on the street believe that the 10-code system has outlived its usefulness. Compose a convincing argument that either supports this contention and offers an alternative form of communication shorthand that appropriately addresses contemporary calls for law enforcement response, or argue that the 10-code remains viable and useful in police communication but would benefit from some modernization; also provide examples of how you would modernize the code. You should answer this question using a minimum of 300 words.
Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code
Explanation:
I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad answer lol
in american government’s federal framework, sovereignty (that is, supreme and independent political authority) is
In the American federal framework, sovereignty is divided between the federal government and the individual states.
In the federal structure of the American government, the federal government and the various states share the supreme and independent political authority known as sovereignty. A key component of federalism is this division of sovereignty. All other powers are reserved to the states or the people, as stated in the Tenth Amendment, according to the U.S. Constitution which establishes the federal government as a limited government with only those powers granted to it.
The states retain residual authority to run their internal affairs, while the federal government has certain enumerated powers, such as the ability to control interstate commerce and declare war. Within the American political system, this shared sovereignty ensures a balance between national leadership and state autonomy.
Learn more about federal structure at:
brainly.com/question/31417366
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements about the challenges of city driving is the
most accurate?
Select one:
a. In spite of the congestion, noise, many distractions, and tight
distances the incidence of crashes is actually lower in cities than in
suburban or rural settings
b. The rate of accidents is about the same in city and suburban
settings, only slightly higher than in rural settings, but more likely to be
fatal than in rural crashes
c. The congestion, noise, many distractions, and tight distances
make the incidence of crashes greater and with a higher percentage of
fatal crashes in cities than in suburban or rural settings
d. The congestion, noise, many distractions, and tight distances
make the incidence of crashes greater in cities than in suburban or rural
settings (although with a higher percentage of minor crashes and lower
percentage of fatal crashes than in non-cities).
The congestion, noise, many distractions, and tight distances make the incidence of crashes greater in cities than in suburban or rural settings is best describes the challenges of city driving.
What is the city driving?City driving entails a range of complicated driving scenarios. There are few parking spaces; you must contend with numerous automobiles, bikers, pedestrians, buses, and one-way streets. Country roads can be dark, unmaintained, and solitary.
Noise, multiple distractions, and short distances all contribute to a greater incidence of collisions in cities than in suburbs or rural regions, but with a higher percentage of minor crashes and a lower percentage of fatal wrecks.
However, driving on city streets presents quite different obstacles than driving on country roads.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about the city driving, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8404503
#SPJ1
Why might a crime scene photographer prefer memory cards with less storage capacity?
A.
They are smaller and easier to carry around.
B.
It is hard to find memory cards with large storage capacity.
C.
If a memory card is bad then less of the crime scene shoot is ruined.
D.
It is illegal to use memory cards with more than 8 GB storage capacity at a crime scene.
Which of the following characteristics was just recently established (since June 2020) as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964? National origin Race Sexual orientation Sex 10:09 AM Religion
The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.
Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:
https://brainly.com/question/1172086
#SPJ11
Jamie Lee and Ross received a signed contract from the seller accepting their $273,000 offer. The seller also agreed to pay two points toward the mortgage. Calculate the benefit of having points paid toward the mortgage if Jamie Lee and Ross are putting a $40,000 down payment on the home.
The benefit of having two points paid toward the mortgage is approximately $30.81 per month and $4,291 over the life of the loan in interest payments.
How we calculated?Points paid toward a mortgage typically reduce the interest rate on the loan, resulting in lower monthly payments and less interest paid over the life of the loan.
To calculate the benefit of having two points paid toward the mortgage, we need to know the interest rate on the loan and the loan amount after the down payment is applied.
Assuming that Jamie Lee and Ross are financing the remaining balance of the home after the down payment with a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at an interest rate of 4%, the loan amount would be:
$273,000 (home price) - $40,000 (down payment) - $5,460 (two points at 2% of loan amount) = $227,540 (loan amount)
The monthly mortgage payment would be approximately $1,084.37, and the total interest paid over the life of the loan would be approximately $173,973.
If the seller did not agree to pay the two points, the loan amount would be $233,460 (i.e., $5,460 higher).
The monthly mortgage payment would then be approximately $1,115.18, and the total interest paid over the life of the loan would be approximately $178,264.
Learn more about mortgage
brainly.com/question/31147395
#SPJ11
Which statement explains the purpose of a suspect claiming "entrapment" at trial ?
A.) To show that they did not commit the crime
B.) To show that their crime is excusable or justifiable
C.) To show that they cannot be held responsible for the crime
D.) To show that no crime was committed in the first place
Answer:C
Explanation: if a person was coerced into committing a crime, he/she respects leniency/
bubba weldon houma louisiana divorce
Answer:
no
Explanation:
yes they were right hahaaaaaaa
Who published criminal investigation, in which he discussed the benefits of the use of science in crime investigations? a edmond locard b hans gross c alphonse bertilion d karl lansteiner
Hans gross published criminal investigation, in which he discussed the benefits of the use of science in crime investigations.
The correct option is B.
What is a criminal investigation?Criminal investigations are a collection of techniques used to analyze crimes and catch culprits. The goal of a criminal investigator is to identify the perpetrators of crimes, their motivations, and identities. They may also look for and question witnesses.
What are the four most typical criminal investigations?When you enroll in our Criminal Justice curriculum here at Northwest Career College, you'll learn about forensics, crimes against property, fraud, and cybercrimes, to name just a few legal topics.
To know more about Criminal Investigation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12190224
#SPJ4
The purpose of the state of union address is to provide the opportunity for the
Answer:
The purpose of the State of the Union address is to provide the opportunity for the "President to address Congress and the nation about the legislative goals to be accomplished," since this is one of the few times that the President has the attention of the entire Congress.
Explanation:
If a person takes the 5th" and refuses to speak so as not to incriminate themselves, this is the 5th Amendment protection against ?
A right against forced self-incrimination.
all of the following are aspects of the political/legal segment of the general environment except: a. attitudes and values. b. taxation laws. c. antitrust laws. d. deregulation philosophies.
Option B is correct.
Taxation laws. A collection of rules known as tax law controls the tax that people must pay to the government.
Which seven general environment parts are there?PESTEL is a framework that considers all environmental elements that may have an influence on an organization, including political, economic, sociocultural, technical, environmental, and legal ones.
Which area of the broader environment describes the type and trajectory of the economy in which a business competes or may compete?Given their potential implications across international borders and the fact that many businesses compete in international marketplaces, demographic categories are frequently studied on a global scale. The economy in which a business competes or may compete is discussed in this section, along with its nature and direction.
To know more about Taxation laws visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/12956626
#SPJ1
Will give Brainlist, pls help, thank u
1. The Latin phrase caveat emptor means “let the buyer beware” and was the attitude regarding consumer law for much of history. How has modern consumer law and government agencies helped being aware as a consumer easier?
2. Federal law requires that all food labels contain the list of ingredients and nutritional information. What right of consumers is being covered with these laws? How do these requirements help protect consumers?
3. Explain the different types of contracts. How do contracts protect consumers?
4. For each scenario decide if a legal contract has been made and explain why or why not:
a. Jamal says to Mikel, “I’m going to sell my iPhone for $200. Mikel replies, “All right, here is the money. I’ll take it.” Jamal accepts the money.
b. Rachel offers Cherie $100 to steal a gold ring from a local store. Cherie steals the gold ring and brings it to Rachel and asks for the money.
c. Hiba purchases a package of meat from a grocery store. She opens it at home and finds the meat has spoiled. When she takes it back to the store for an exchange they refuse to exchange it. She says the store has a responsibility to replace it since they presented it as fresh.
The major way in which modern consumer law and government agencies has helped being aware as a consumer easier based on the Latin phrase caveat emptor is:
To let them become aware that a particular product is not for sale and that the prospective buyer should engage in due diligence.The right of consumers which is being covered with these laws of food labeling is:
Right to know what they are consumingThe way in which these requirements of food labeling help protect consumers is:
It helps them to know the nutritional content of what they are about to consume and also the ingredients to help them avoid possible allergies and other health risks.The different types of contracts are:
Fixed-price contract. ...Cost-reimbursement contract. ...Cost-plus contract. ...Time and materials contract. ...Unit price contract. ...Bilateral contract. ...Unilateral contract.The major way in which contracts protect consumers is:
It lets them contest the case in a law court if the agreement is broken.For each scenario decide if a legal contract has been made and explain why or why not:
A. Yes, a legal contract has been made because an agreement by word has been reached between Jamal and Mikel for the sale of his phoneB. No, a legal contract has not been made because the action which was negotiated is not a legally binding as it involves theft of an item.What is a Contract?This refers to a legally binding agreement between two or more parties where they agree to do or not to do something.
Read more about contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/984979
In order to get your original driver license of any type: You will be tested on what four (4) categories.
A) Vision test
B) knowledge of motor vehicles law
C) Traffic Signs
D) Driving Skills
E) All of the above
Answer:
E...
Explanation:
To get your original driver license, you will be tested on vision, motor vehicle law, traffic signs, and driving skills. The correct option is e.
You will be put through four tests in order to get your first driver's license such as vision, legal knowledge of motor vehicles, traffic signs and driving prowess. The vision test determines whether you have the required visual acuity levels for safe driving. Your knowledge of the driving laws and regulations is assessed by the knowledge test.
In order to pass the traffic signs test, you must show that you can recognize a variety of traffic signs and their meanings. Your capacity to drive safely and effectively is evaluated by the driving skills test. If you pass all of these exams, you can be sure that you're ready to get your driver's license and can drive safely.
learn more about driver license here
brainly.com/question/29441847
#SPJ2
Abigail was asked to leave the Proctor's home because Elizabeth suspects that Abigail and Proctor have had an affair. Abigail's feelings towards John Proctor are of love, while w/ Elizabeth Proctor, she despises her.
The situation you have described appears to be a character relationship from Arthur Miller's play, "The Crucible."
Abigail Williams, the protagonist of the play, has been dismissed from the Proctor's home after Elizabeth Proctor, John Proctor's wife, suspects that Abigail and John have had an affair. Abigail's feelings towards John Proctor are indeed those of love and desire, as she had an affair with him in the past and still harbors strong feelings for him. However, Abigail's feelings towards Elizabeth Proctor are those of resentment and hostility, as she views Elizabeth as an obstacle to her relationship with John. This complex relationship dynamic is a significant theme in the play, as it contributes to the tension and conflict that drives the plot forward.
To know more about The Crucible click here:
brainly.com/question/27770781
#SPJ4
what case decided that evidence obtained unlawfully may not be used against defendants in criminal court?
Answer:i think mapp v Ohio good luck with your work
Explanation:
Question┗(•_•)―→
• What is the Act ( 1972 ) in Indian Constitution ?
Answer:
This Bill seeks to give effect to the recommendations of the Law Commission of India in its Forty-fourth and Forty-fifth Reports on Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court on certificate of fitness.
It is true or false that in the American legal system, case law results every time any court decides a case.
the answer is true explanation my uncle's an attorney
How many calendar days does a new employee have to complete the RBS training program
Any on-premise alcohol server and manager must be certified by an accredited RBS training provider and pass an ABC exam within 60 calendar days from the first date of employment. The RBS exam is currently available in English, Spanish, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Hindi, and Punjabi.
2. Helen toured a town house built by Thames. While inspecting the kitchen, she opened a cabinet; the cabinet door fell and struck her on the head. An examination revealed that no screws were affixed to the door to secure it to the cabinet. She filed suit against the cabinetmaker and offered proof of her injury relying on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Should she recover
Answer:
The accident is her proof.
Explanation:
So, here are the things that needs to be noted in order to answer this problem/ question effectively and efficiently;
=> the house is built by Thames.
=> During Helen's kitchen inspection, "she opened a cabinet; the cabinet door fell and struck her on the head. "
=> It was shown that no screws were affixed to the door to secure it to the cabinet.
=> Helen filed suit against the cabinetmaker and offered proof of her injury relying on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur''
So, THE DOCTRINE OF RES IPSA LOQUITUR is used by injured people or Individual filling suit against another party. This is done in order to sue the accused of being "negligent" and make sure that the accused pay for the damages/injuries. Thus is what Helen is going to use to "fight" the cabinetmake in the court of law.
what factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation? if the defendant has formed a relationship with the third party. if the defendant has signed a contract with the third party. if the plaintiff had a contract with another party who breached the contract. if the plaintiff and the defendant had signed a contract.
The plaintiff should consider the specific facts and circumstances of the situation to determine which interference tort applies.
There are different types of interference torts, including interference with prospective economic advantage, interference with contractual relations, and interference with business relations. Each type of tort has specific elements that must be proven by the plaintiff.
If the defendant has formed a relationship with the third party, the plaintiff may need to show that the defendant intentionally interfered with the plaintiff's prospective economic advantage. If the defendant has signed a contract with the third party, the plaintiff may need to show that the defendant interfered with the plaintiff's contractual relations.
If the plaintiff had a contract with another party who breached the contract, the plaintiff may need to show that the defendant knowingly induced the breach of contract. If the plaintiff and the defendant had signed a contract, the plaintiff may need to show that the defendant breached the contract or interfered with the plaintiff's business relations.
Ultimately, the plaintiff should consult with a legal expert to determine the best course of action based on the specific circumstances of their case.
Learn more about interference tort: https://brainly.com/question/2912204
#SPJ11
Sam and Chris were friends and went to the bar together. Both of them had two glasses of wine (Merlot). Sam was small and weighed 170 lbs. while Chris was a bigger guy weighing in at 275lbs. Chris always wanted to buy Sam’s 2019 Harley Davidson motorcycle but Sam always told him that it wasn’t for sale. Chris had his concealed weapon on him at the bar and gestured toward the weapon. Chris stood up and told Sam to seriously reconsider whether his motorcycle was for sale while consistently showing the imprint of his weapon against his jeans. Sam thought Chris was armed with a gun and immediately told Chris that his motorcycle was now for sale. Chris demanded a sale price of only $3,000 and Sam sold the motorcycle.
The following day, Sam went to see his lawyer to discuss whether the sale of his motorcycle was valid. Specifically, he mentioned to his lawyer that he two glasses of wine and couldn’t remember all of the details of the event. In addition, he told his lawyer that he felt pressured by Chris to sell his motorcycle and wasn’t sure whether he was armed.
The sale of motorcycle was not valid as Sam was not in a state of forming a proper consent for the agreement due to intoxication and he was also coerced into selling it because of fear of weapon.
About Consent
Whenever one person voluntarily accepts another's request or wish, this is known as consent. It is a term that is used frequently and has precise definitions in a variety of contexts, including the law, medicine, science, or intimate relationships. Consent may not mean the same thing when used in certain settings. For instance, a person who is mentally ill, has a poor mental capacity, or is younger than the age of consent to se-xual activity may voluntarily participate in such a s-ex encounter that yet falls short of the legal standard for consent as specified by the relevant law.
To know more about consent:
brainly.com/question/29220731
#SPJ1
When going to vote in Texas, we must bring an acceptable ID with we to the polls. Some examples of acceptable IDs include: - Texas driver's license issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) - Texas election identification certificate issued by DPS - Texas personal identification card issued by DPS - Texas license to carry a handgun issued by DPS - United States military identification card containing the person's photograph - United States citizenship certificate containing the person's photograph - United States passport It is important to remember to bring one of these acceptable IDs with you when you go to vote in Texas, as you will not be allowed to cast your vote without one.
That is correct. Texas law requires voters to present an acceptable form of photo identification before they can cast their ballot.
The list of acceptable IDs includes options such as a Texas driver's license, election identification certificate, personal identification card, or license to carry a handgun. The ID must have the voter's photo, name, and date of birth, and it must have been issued by the state of Texas or another state, or by the federal government.
It is important for voters to bring an acceptable ID with them to the polls in order to ensure that their vote is counted. If a voter does not have an acceptable ID, they may cast a provisional ballot, which will be counted only if the voter presents a valid ID to the elections office within 72 hours after the election.
Overall, it is important for voters to be aware of the requirements for voting in Texas and to bring an acceptable ID with them to the polls in order to ensure that their vote is counted.
Learn more about Texas visit: brainly.com/question/30504811
#SPJ11
The power of judicial review allows courts to decide whether an act of government is __.
Answer:
Judicial review is the power of the courts to decide whether laws and actions of the government are allowed under the Constitution. When a court decides they are not allowed, it orders that the law or action be considered null and void.
Explanation:
Chris is the owner of a fast food stall. Dan bought some food from Chris' stall. Dan became
seriously ill soon after he ate the food. He spent two weeks in hospital. It was discovered
that the food from the stall was contaminated.
Doctors found that Dan was very likely to suffer more than most people from food poisoning.
Dan eventually recovered from his illness, but found that he had lost £20 000 earnings from
his work. He also lost out on an expected promotion at work as he failed to attend an
interview when he was in hospital.
Dan had given some of his food to Euan, a homeless person, who also became ill for a short time.
Advise Dan as to his rights and remedies against Chris. Advise Euan as to his rights and remedies
against Dan or Chris 20 marks
it would be against chris because he cooked the food (is the owner aswell) because dan did't know that the food was contaminated.
Explanation: