This unit of government handled all transactions with the Indians at first Oklahoma history

Answer:

they come frome southern an Eastern europe

Explanation:

because it is the only answer that make sense

The purpose behind the voyages of Zheng He, Christopher Columbus, and Samuel de Champlain is to find a sea route to India and China going from west Europe.

Voyage is a trip, travel, or passage, particularly one to a far-off land or one made by sea or air.

Zheng and Christopher Columbus He and Columbus both lived in the 15th century and were explorers who made important discoveries.

Italian adventurer Christopher Columbus arrived in what are now the Bahamas on October 12, 1492. On an island that the local Lucayans called Guanahani, Columbus and his ships made landfall. It was christened San Salvador by Columbus.

Therefore, To find a sea route to India and China going from west Europe is the main purpose behind the voyages of Zheng He, Christopher Columbus, and Samuel de Champlain is to find a sea route to India and China going from west Europe.

Learn more about Voyage, here;

https://brainly.com/question/20828289

#SPJ1

Answer:

Confusing a correlation for a cause-and-effect relationship

If person should take into account the precise targets or deliverables that signify key moments in the project's timetable when choosing a goal for milestone two.

The primary checkpoints on the path to successfully meeting the project's timetable are indicated by critical milestones, which denote the significant project phases. Prioritize goals and tasks while establishing goal-related tasks.

To advance in a job and seek a master's degree, one must complete a bachelor's degree. Establish project milestones to convey to stakeholders the specified project goals and the timetable for achieving them.

As a result, the significance of the goal of milestone two are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on milestone, here:

https://brainly.com/question/3902746

#SPJ1

Answer:

Thesis: Mill argues that it is in the best interest of society to promote individuality which ensures  liberty over using authority to conform subjects to a particular type of person conducive to  following orders.

Definitions

Liberty: Mill defines Liberty using three basic criteria developed on page 15.

1. An individual maintains the ability to freely think and feel on all subjects and may  express their thoughts,

2. An individual maintains the ability to freely frame their own life according to their tastes  and preferences regardless of public opinion, providing that their choices do not harm  others.

3. An individual maintains the ability to freely unite with other free individuals, providing that  the purpose of uniting is not the harm of others.  Clearly, individual rights are closely tied to Liberty. Using this definition of Liberty, Mill links the  protection of certain individual rights to Liberty.

Arguments

Argument 1: Opinions (pg. 22-23 & 43)

Promoting individuality leads to a multitude of opinions which creates a broad dialogue  where opinions and discussed and refined until they become uncontested truths. Only by  listening to all sides of an issue can one be wise and reach an uncontested truth. Mill  furthers that “the well-being of mankind may almost be measured by the number and  gravity of the truths which have reached the point of being uncontested.” The opinions  and dialogue associated with individuality will therefore increase progress. It follows that maintaining individuality is in the best interest of society so that uncontested truths, and  subsequently progress, may be increased.

Argument 2: Individuality builds character in a society (pg 59)

Mill argues that the expression of an individual’s desires and impulses define a person’s  character. He further claims that “one whose desires and impulses are not his own, has  no character, no more than a steam engine has character.” Society in turn benefits from  strong characters. Mill argues that society needs people of strong characters in order to  progress. Therefore, by preferring individuality, society builds character which helps general welfare.

Argument 3: Individuality is required for the progression of society (pg. 62-63)Mill claims that “individuality is the same thing [as] development, and that it is only the  cultivation of individuality which produces… well-developed human beings.” This is  because the originality comes from individuals directing their own life which is needed for  progress (like discovering new truths or challenge old truths.) As Mill contends, “genius  can only breathe freely in an atmosphere of freedom.” Without these geniuses, “human  life would be a stagnant pool.” By linking it to progress, it is clear that society can  effectively better itself through individuality.

Counter Arguments

There are two type of counter-arguments that are anticipated to our claim that society is better  off to promote individuality. The first is that the role of society is not best spent focusing on promoting liberty. The second is that individuality does not benefit society.

Counter-Argument 1: Role of Society is to use Authority to control subject Instead of how Mill defines the role of society as cultivating individualism, one might  argue that the role of society is to use authority to coerce subjects. Past philosophers  like Hobbes argued that it is best for subjects to be under a powerful sovereign. One  may argue that the role of society is not to cultivate individuality, but rather use authority  to suppress individuality for the best interest of society.

Counter-Argument 2: Calvinistic Theory (pg. 61)

Mill presents the case that one may argue that human nature is not good. In this case,  society would only be hurting itself by trying to cultivate individuality. This falls in line with  Calvinistic Theory that human’s main objective is to obey God’s command and that  human nature is corrupt. This would mean that it would be detrimental for society to try  to promote individuality since it impedes human’s main purpose.

Counter-Argument 3: Customs

Similar to the arguments presented by Tocqueville, one may argue that customs are an  important part of maintaining a society. The type of individualism that Mill argues for  diminishes the power of customs because it begs people to challenge customs with  individual thought. People like Tocqueville may argue that individuality is bad because it  diminishes the role customs.

Explanation:

Answer:

Austria wanted to keep Lombardy and Venetia; they also did not want Italy to be able to fight wars against them or rule out their trade

Answer:

Common Sense is a 47-page pamphlet written by Thomas Paine in 1775–1776 advocating independence from Great Britain to people in the Thirteen Colonies. Writing in clear and persuasive prose, Paine marshaled moral and political arguments to encourage common people in the Colonies to fight for egalitarian government.

Explanation:

Answer:

Your answer is: A) his car

Explanation:

Answer:

Despite the harmful agricultural innovations, the weather was very favorable in 1958 and the harvest was also good. However, the amount of labor which was diverted to steel production and construction projects meant that much of the harvest was left to rot because it was not collected in some areas.

Explanation: Its a only a us born citizen can become president so easy

Answer:

1)The immediate result of the mutiny was a general housecleaning of the Indian administration.

2)The East India Company was abolished in favour of the direct rule of India by the British government.

Answer:

I agree with the statement “The Treaty of Versailles was a fair settlement” to a certain extent. I know that Germany had been unmerciful during the war leading to thirty seven million casualties. Therefore “The Big Three”: Lloyd George (Great Britain), Clemenceau (France) and Wilson (USA), the driving forces behind the treaty, need not be merciful in return. When you put the Treaty of Versailles in perspective against World War I it appears to be fair towards Germany. The war had destroyed most country’s economies and a large area of land. These, among many other things, needed to be restored. Considering that Germany had been defeated and they were largely at fault for the start of the war it was fair to make them pay reparations. After the war Germany was still a serious threat to the world. People believed that they would not give up. Therefore one of the main aims of the peace treaty was to make sure that the risk of Germany attacking again was as low as possible. The treaty of Versailles was fair to take away Germany’s armed forces and colonies as it protected the rest of the world in the short term and punished them.  However, we now know that the Treaty of Versailles failed as the world has seen another, even more horrific war. I believe that the Treaty was unnecessarily harsh and not as fair as it should have been. All of the victorious nations were furious with Germany so at the time very few thought of being fair towards their enemy of four years. This is reflected in the treaty through the reparations Germany was forced to pay. These were outrageously high (£660 million) and later changed. The confiscation of Germany’s territories and colonies and the reduction in their army was also excessively severe. Although this was meant to keep peace in the short term it only angered Germany more, sparking revenge. War Guilt was also an unnecessary condition that publicly humiliated Germany triggering resentment. This was tactlessly done to compensate the victorious public who desired a subject to blame  for the loss of their loved ones. Similarly the rest of the treaty was too harsh because the rulers had to please their countries if they wished to be re-elected. Germany did not get any second chances from the peace treaty. Their pride majorly suffered at the forced decrease in their army and they were not able to improve themselves in their colonies as those were repossessed causing jealousy and anger. The peace treaty unfairly focused too much on punishing Germany for what they did wrong rather than trying to maintain peace. This is because the public was too angry to think intelligently about preventing future losses.   In general I believe that the Treaty of Versailles had good intentions however mainly due to public pressure it was too harsh and unfair. The Big Three had an impossible task and pleasing everyone was not probable but I believe they did the best that they could at the time. However the treaty was largely unfair and too severe contributing to World War II.

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The Romans established a form of government — a republic — that was copied by countries for centuries. The government of the United States is based partly on Rome's model.

Similar to the debate regarding Confucianism being a religion or a philosophical mindset, it can be felt that Armstrong was trying to promote a new way of philosophical thoughts through his mindset.

Philosophical thoughts can be referred to or considered as the thoughts that can nurture and influence a large part of the beliefs and ideologies followed by an individual or a group as a part of their daily lifestyle.

People felt Confucianism as a religion in itself, however, the feeling of Armstrong's ideologies was much shorter in its scope, as he promoted beliefs that weren't sought as a religion.

Therefore, the significance regarding philosophical thoughts of Armstrong has been aforementioned.

Learn more about the philosophical thoughts here:

https://brainly.com/question/7077297

#SPJ1

Answer: General Robert E. Lee surrendered his Confederate troops to the Union's Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, marking the beginning of the end of the grinding four-year-long American Civil War.

Explanation:

This is a big question and has been debated by Kantians for a long time. Kant says lying is categorically wrong and this is why it gets him into trouble with scholars. According to a Kantian example, if someone knocks on your door and wants to know where your friend is so he can kill him, you must tell the truth. He was an absolutist - or is interpreted that way. But Kant also says men must lie sometimes, and this is the Original Sin. We violate strict rules of reason for empirical needs to stay alive, etc.

I don’t agree with this, but I also find that people who jump on Kant for this may not fully understand him. I’ve been thinking about this one as well, and have not fully considered his argument in the context of the rest of his philosophy. But the Kantian project is not quite complete, there are bits that need to be filled in that scholars haven’t yet.

Answer:

Option 4

Explanation:

A person with good knowledge of the event writes a secondhand account. This individual may or may not have experienced the event but has a sound knowledge and hence present a more equated (humeous) view that can be afforded

Hence, option 4 is correct

Answer:

Canal systems, such as the Eerie and Pennsylvania chains, and railroads connected Eastern factories with Western markets.

Explanation:

In the field of history, the use of source materials is critical to understanding the past and shaping historical interpretations.

The most valid interpretation is one that is supported by a wide range of credible and reliable sources, which have been examined critically by historians. When analyzing source materials, historians must consider a range of factors, including the context of the source, its credibility, and any biases or limitations that may exist.

The most valid interpretation is one that is based on a careful and critical analysis of multiple sources, which provide different perspectives on the topic being studied. Historians must consider the context of each source, such as the time period and location in which it was created, as well as the intended audience and purpose of the source.

They must also evaluate the credibility of the source, considering factors such as the author's expertise, their potential biases or agendas, and any limitations of the source, such as gaps in information or incomplete documentation.

Historians must also consider the relationship between different sources, looking for patterns, consistencies, and contradictions that may reveal different perspectives on the topic being studied. By examining source materials critically and evaluating their credibility, historians can develop a more nuanced and accurate interpretation of the past.

For more such questions on history visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24466312

#SPJ8

Answer:

hmmmm... dont see any statements

Explanation:

sry I have copied it from internet bcoz i dont know

Answer:

Confucian

Explanation:

The Song, Han, and Ming were all dynasties in China.

Confucian was not a dynasty.

Instead, Confucian relates to the philosophy of Confucianism.

This philosophy was widespread in China, and many of the dynasties. However, it wasn't a dynasty itself.

So, the correct answer is Confucian.

Answer: - Places with limited rain and harsh weather conditions

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

only the Romans used columns in their architecture.

The timeline referenced in this question is not provided, but based on the options given, it can be inferred that it includes events related to the interwar period and the lead-up to World War II.

Option (1) suggests that the events on the timeline represent attempts to force empires to decolonize. This is partially true, as there were efforts by various groups to challenge the imperial powers and gain independence. However, decolonization was not the primary focus of the interwar period or the causes of World War II.

Option (2) suggests that the events represent efforts by Manchuria and Czechoslovakia to maintain the balance of power. While these countries were indeed involved in geopolitical maneuvering during this time, their actions were not the primary focus of the interwar period or the causes of World War II.

Option (3) suggests that the events represent the expansion of communist forces into Europe and Asia. While there were certainly communist movements and actions during this time period, this option also does not fully capture the complex geopolitical and economic factors that led to World War II.

Option (4) suggests that the events on the timeline represent the underlying causes of World War II. This is the most accurate option, as the interwar period was marked by economic instability, rising nationalism and militarism, and territorial disputes that eventually led to the outbreak of World War II. However, it is important to note that the causes of the war were multifaceted and cannot be attributed solely to one factor or event.

Read more about WWII here:

https://brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ1

Answer:

Huh

What. I cant tell if this is a real question or im to high