Answer:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, ...
Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, ...
Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice, ...
Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, ...
Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, ...
Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, ...
Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice,
More items...
Explanation:
Answer:
justices are the people of the court who give verdicts on cases
i hope its helpful
signs that use blue, white and red colors and have the interstate number located on the middle of the sign are: a) regulatory signs b) warning signs c) guide signs d) interstate signs
Signs that use blue, white and red colors and have the interstate number located on the middle of the sign are interstate signs.
A directional sign is the interstate sign. The route number of the roadway is indicated on interstate signs. They frequently also indicate the state's name and orientation. A route that connects two or more states is called an interstate. When crossing state lines, interstate signage aid in navigation.
Interstate signs have the term "Interstate" written on top of a shield-shaped background. Large crossroads will have this sign, which may also have arrows or a direction. with a red line running along the top and white numbers on a blue background.
To learn more about interstate signs please click on the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/29648600
#SPJ4
250-word paper on key elements of crime 50 points.
If anyone is up for the challenge:
research and summarize the following:
What are the elements that must be present for a crime to be said to have occurred?
Describe the features of crime
what are the arguments used in defending against a criminal indictment?
I wont turn in your exact words, however I will be rewriting them.
Thank you!!
Answer:
Bet
Explanation:
Crime usually involves the act of the crime, the individuals mental state at the time, and the effect it had. The elements of a crime are criminal act, criminal intent, concurrence, causation, harm, and attendant circumstances. Only crimes that have a bad after effect have the elements of cause and harm. Arguments most commonly used is "my client didn't do it", "my client did it, but is not responsible for said crime because they are insane.", "My client has a good reasoning behind it.", and lastly "My client has been influenced by outside forces such as the police to do this crime".
(good luck!)
BRAINLIEST !!
Jane and Wilma have been arrested for robbing Fort Knox. They are now in separate isolation cells. Both Jane and Wilma want to go free. Prosecutor Betty makes each of them this offer: “You can either talk or stay silent. If you talk and your accomplice stays silent, you get to go home and your accomplice gets a sentence of up to 20 years. If she talks while you stay silent, she goes home and you get a sentence of up to 20 years. If you both talk you’ll both be convicted, but you'll both get out in ten years. On the other hand, if you both stay silent, I only can charge you for the weapons charges—a one year maximum sentence. So decide if you want to talk. You have until morning to make a decision.”
This scenario is known as the prisoner's dilemma. Researchers use it to better understand how people approach decision making in everyday life, as well as in criminal situations.
For a moment, pretend you're Jane. If you and Wilma both stay silent, that leads to the best outcome for both of you. Neither of you will face multiple years in prison. But counting on Wilma to stay silent requires a leap of faith. If Wilma confesses, you're better off confessing too – it means 10 years in prison instead of 20. Staying silent could mean 20 years in prison.
As Jane, what would you do and why?
Which state courts conduct some pretrial activities for more important ones?
Answer:In some states, the trial court and the appellate court may conduct some pretrial activities for more important cases. For example, the trial court may conduct a pretrial conference or a hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence. The appellate court may conduct a pre-argument conference to discuss the issues and arguments in an appeal before the oral argument.
Explanation:
Compare the Bill of Rights from our last unit with the International Human rights Law from
this unit, pick two rights that are in one but not the other and explain why you think this
happened.
When comparing the Bill of Rights, which refers to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, with International Human Rights Law, represented primarily by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), there are indeed rights that are present in one but not the other. Two such examples are:
The Right to Keep and Bear Arms (in the Bill of Rights, specifically the Second Amendment): This right is not explicitly present in International Human Rights Law, as articulated in the UDHR. The reason for this omission can be attributed to the different historical, cultural, and legal contexts of the United States compared to the international community. The right to bear arms holds significant historical and constitutional significance in the United States due to its association with self-defense, the protection of individual liberties, and the historical context of the American Revolution.The Right to Asylum (in International Human Rights Law, specifically Article 14 of the UDHR): This right is not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of Rights. The absence of this right in the Bill of Rights can be attributed to the fact that the United States Constitution primarily focuses on the relationship between the government and its citizens, whereas the right to asylum relates to the treatment of individuals seeking refuge in a country due to fear of persecution in their home country. Asylum is a concept more closely associated with international law and human rights frameworks, addressing the rights and protections of individuals across borders.These differences highlight how legal documents and frameworks can reflect the unique historical, cultural, and legal contexts of a particular country, shaping the specific rights enshrined within them.For more such questions on Amendments
https://brainly.com/question/458137
#SPJ8
A car driven by a vacationer and a tractor-trailer driven by truck driver collided with each other. The vacationer filed an action based on negligence against the truck driver in federal district court in the state in which he resided. The court had subject-matter jurisdiction over this action but not personal jurisdiction over the truck driver, who did not reside in the forum state but rather in the state in which the accident had occurred. The truck driver timely filed a motion to dismiss the action due to lack of personal jurisdiction and proper venue. May the court transfer the action to the federal district court for the district in which the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice
Answer:
Answer C is correct
Explanation:
Although venue isn't improper in the forum court because the accident did not occur in the forum state nor did the defendant truck driver reside there, the forum court may transfer the action to any judicial district in which it originally could of been brought if it determines that such transfer in the interest of justice. Here, the action could of been brought into the federal district court for the district in which the truck driver resides
Considering the situation described in the question, it is true that:
The court may transfer the action to the federal district court for the district where the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice.
This is based on the United States law code 28, Part IV, Chapter 87, Subsection 1404, Article A., which explains the need for Change of Venue.
This portion of the United States code stated that for convenience purposes that involve parties to the case and witnesses, particularly in the interest of justice, a district court might move any civil action to any other district to which all parties have consented.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that it is true that the court may transfer the action to the federal district court for the district where the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24893162
Explain the concept of “Checks & Balances” and explain one power that each of the branches has over another.
Please help
The concept of "Checks and Balances" is a fundamental principle of the United States government's system of separation of powers. It refers to the system of constitutional checks and balances that ensures that no one branch of government has too much power, and that each branch is able to limit the powers of the other branches.
Some examples of the powers that each branch has over anotherLegislative Branch over Executive Branch: The Legislative Branch (Congress) has the power to override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This means that Congress can pass a bill into law, even if the President has vetoed it.
Executive Branch over Legislative Branch: The Executive Branch (President) has the power to veto bills passed by Congress. This means that the President can prevent a bill from becoming law by refusing to sign it.
Judicial Branch over Executive Branch: The Judicial Branch (Supreme Court) has the power of judicial review, which allows it to declare actions taken by the Executive Branch unconstitutional. This means that the Supreme Court can limit the power of the President by ruling that his actions are not in line with the Constitution.
Executive Branch over Judicial Branch: The Executive Branch has the power to appoint judges and justices to the federal courts, including the Supreme Court. This means that the President can influence the direction of the Judiciary Branch by appointing judges who share his political views.
Legislative Branch over Judicial Branch: The Legislative Branch has the power to impeach and remove judges and justices from the federal courts, including the Supreme Court. This means that Congress can remove a judge who is deemed to be unfit for the job or who has violated the law.
Learn more about Checks and Balances at:
https://brainly.com/question/17715922
#SPJ1
Investigating careers. Answer quick, 80 points.
One of the main issues pre-school teachers face is helping kids do which of the following?
A. be away from their parents
B. learn a different language
C. pass standardized tests
D. graduate pre-school
Answer:
Explanation: passing standardized tests will help the teachers in gaining more confidence while teaching students and to interact with them in a different manner.
How does specialization enable countries to trade with one another?
Answer:
Specialization enables countries to trade with one another by allowing them to focus on producing and exporting the goods and services that they are most efficient at producing. This can be because they have an abundance of a particular resource, such as oil or timber, or because they have developed expertise in a particular industry, such as manufacturing or technology. By specializing in the production of certain goods or services, countries can take advantage of economies of scale and produce a larger quantity at a lower cost.
For example, a country with an abundance of fertile land and a favorable climate for agriculture may specialize in producing and exporting food products, such as grains or fruits. Another country with a strong technology sector may specialize in producing and exporting high-tech goods, such as computers or smartphones. By trading with one another, these countries can each specialize in what they are best at and benefit from the lower prices and higher quality of the goods and services that they import.
Specialization also enables countries to take advantage of differences in the cost of production and labor. For example, a country with a lower cost of labor may be able to produce goods at a lower cost than another country, making it more competitive in the global market. By specializing in the production of goods that they can produce at a lower cost, countries can increase their exports and boost their economies.
Overall, specialization enables countries to trade with one another by allowing them to focus on producing and exporting the goods and services that they are most efficient at producing, and by taking advantage of differences in the cost of production and labor. This helps to create a more efficient global economy and allows countries to benefit from the goods and services produced by other countries.
what was some key evidence in the Wayne Williams case
Reread this sentence from the lesson:
The more widespread voting became, the more the nation truly became “of the people.”
Which principle of American democracy is most closely associated with the expansion of voting rights?
A. checks and balances
B. federalism
C. popular sovereignty
D. rule of law
The principle of American democracy that is most closely associated with the expansion of voting rights is C. popular sovereignty.
What is popular sovereignty ?The fundamental principle of popular sovereignty prevails whereby the government's power source is derived from people’s consent, hence recognizing that individuals hold ultimate political authority hence in democratic systems allowing for active participation options such as voting.
Over the years with America expanding its voter registry to include all race genders and property owners regardless of status from solely white male landowners. These transformations have paved way towards creating a genuinely democratic society echoing pervasive principles of democracy through the increased levels of enfranchisement endorsement pivotal points.
Find out more on popular sovereignty at https://brainly.com/question/28745095
#SPJ1
Some Native American tribes organized themselves by having
all male adult members of the tribe vote for any proposed
laws or changes. What type of government is described?
Answer:
can you give more details pls?
Explanation:
If you were given a speeding violation and told to report to court for a hearing, who would MOST likely be listening to your case?
A. a jury of your peers
B. a Supreme Court justice
C. a Justice of the Peace
D. a Federal Magistrate
Fatima signs up to volunteer with the Special Olympics. Which task might she complete as part of her duties?
signing people up to vote
keeping time during a race
tutoring children in science
sorting deliveries at a food bank
Answer:
Keeping time during a race, i think
Explanation:
hope this helps ッ
As a volunteer with the Special Olympics, Fatima could finish the responsibility of keeping time during a race. Accordingly, choice (B) is precise response.
Special Olympics is an association that gives sports valuable chances to individuals with scholarly handicaps, and keeping time during races is a fundamental job in guaranteeing fair and exact rivalry. Volunteers are in many cases liable for aiding different parts of the games, like timing competitors' exhibitions, recording results, and offering help to members.
By keeping time during races, Fatima adds to the smooth and effective execution of the Special Olympics occasions, permitting competitors to exhibit their capacities and partake in the soul of sportsmanship and consideration.
Along these lines, choice (B) is exact response.
Learn more about Special Olympics, from:
brainly.com/question/34566114
#SPJ3
What is the Mosaic Code of the Israelites? How did it influence the foundation of the U.S. legal system?
Answer:
The Mosaic Code is a set of laws found in the Hebrew Bible. It is also known as the Law of Moses or the Pentateuch. The Code includes laws governing many aspects of life, including morality, family life, criminal law, and civil law. The Code has been influential in the development of the U.S. legal system, particularly in the areas of property law and contract law, because, like the Code, the U.S. legal system is based on common law which, in turn, is based on court decisions.
please mention at least 20 fundamental human rights in the constitution
Answer:
The fundamental human rights contained in the constitution of Nigeria are: the Right to Life, the Right to Dignity of Human Person, the Right to Personal Liberty, the Right to Fair Hearing, the Right to Private and Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, the Right to Freedom of Expression.
Write a short essay on why you want a career in public safety and communications . specifically a 911 dispatcher
Complex-risk situations in driving
are?
Complex-risk situations in driving are high-traffic roads with speed limits near 70 mph.
Major highways with speed restrictions of up to 85 mph are examples of complex risk situations. intersections between cities and suburbs. crowded multiple-lane roads.
Driving in rural places can be dangerous because of bad road conditions, inadequate lighting, and wildlife. Compared to urban and suburban roads, rural locations frequently have more potholes, cracks, and other obvious evidence of wear and tear. There is sometimes little or no street lighting on these roadways.
Learn more about driving, here;
https://brainly.com/question/2619161
#SPJ6
what is chromotography ?
Hii :))
A technique used to separate the components of a chemical mixture by moving the mixture along a stationary material, such as gelatin is known as chromotography.
DRAIOCHT ♡◇♡◇
Answer:
➢ the separation of a liquid mixture by passing it through a material through which some parts of the mixture travel further than others.
Explanation:
hope it will help you have a great day bye and Mark brainlist if the answer is correct
\(kai6417\)
#carry on learning
A driver with a false sense of confidence feels that he is...
A. not in control.
B. in control of some things.
C. in total control.
Answer:
A False Sense Of Confidence Would Be Not Be NOT Believing In Yourself. We Can Conclude The Driver Would Probably Be Recklessly.
A Would Be Your Answer, He Trusts Himself But It's Reckless if he does something.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
You got paid $567.18 and it was direct deposited in your checking account. You pay three bills that total $214.82, but they will take a few days to process. Two days later, your account balance is $492.63. How much money can you spend without overdrawing the account?
A.
$214.83
B.
$352.36
C.
$492.63
D.
$567.18
What are the purposes of the labeling laws set and enforced by the FDA and USDA? Select all that apply.
to ensure the safety of the food supply
to provide nutrition information to consumers
to keep prices of food products as low as possible
to provide support to small farmers and producers
to let consumers know the ingredients in packaged foods
When a medicine is approved by the FDA, CDER has evaluated the drug's effect data and determined that the benefits of the drug outweigh any known or prospective dangers for the targeted population.
What is meant by FDA?U.S. Food and Drug Administration is known as FDA. When the FDA approves a medication, CDER has examined the drug's effect data and found that the benefits of the medication outweigh any known or potential risks for the intended use.
The FDA regulates all foods and food additives imported into or offered for sale in interstate commerce, with the exception of beef, poultry, and some processed egg products, which are under the control of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
The purpose of labelling are as follows,
The product is accurately described on the label, along with the product specifications.It provides comprehensive information about the contested product.It lists all of the product's contents, their applications, and any precautions that should be taken when using them.The regulations guarantee the public's safety when using cosmetics.
Except for things like meat or possibly fowl and its products, all foods are safe.It guarantees the safety and efficacy of all medications, including veterinary medications.They guarantee the effectiveness and safety of biological goods like blood and tissues.To learn more about Food and Drug Administration refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24827164
#SPJ4
1 point
A snapping turtle weighs 15 pounds and eats about 2 ounces of food per day. A raccoon weighs 25 pounds and eats 6 ounces of food per day.
Which animal eats more ounces of food per pound of body weight?
type your answer. I
Answer: Raccoon
I gave the ounces of food per body weight in case you needed it.
Snapping Turtle: 7.5
Raccoon: 6.25
my number is sandra michales and I live in pittsburgh and my # is 469 786 555
HAAHHAHAHHA QUEEN
Explanation:
Answer:
how ya doen sandra im ethan
Explanation:
What does the Statute of Limitations require that parties to a contract who have been damaged or who question the contract's provisions do
Answer:
That they just act within a statutory period.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Summarize the Torress v. Texas Department of Public Safety Supreme Court case.
Answer:
Texas Department of Public Safety. In Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, the Supreme Court considered whether the states, by ratifying the Constitution, gave Congress the power to authorize suits against states using its constitutional war powers.
Explanation:
Jack is enjoying a day at the beach with some friends. One friend needs to run to the store for sandwiches, and Jack offers to drive. They leave their things on the beach, jumping into Jack’s Jeep. Unfortunately, as they pull onto the road, another car fails to slow down and hits them. The other driver is upset, even though she is the one who hit Jack. When police get to the scene, she points out to the officers that Jack was driving barefooted. “You’re not supposed to do that!” she cries out. She repeats what her driver’s ed instructor taught her, that it might cause a driver to slip and take their foot off the pedals. The officer acknowledges that driving without shoes might be dangerous but does not give Jack a ticket. What is the MOST plausible reason for this? A. Jack is friends with the officer and received special treatment. B. Jack has a disability and is not required to wear shoes while driving. C. The other driver’s actions were more dangerous, so they trump what Jack did. D. While driving without footwear might be dangerous, it is not illegal.
Answer:
D. While driving without footwear might be dangerous, it is not illegal.
Explanation:
The most plausible reason that the police officer did not give Jack a ticket for driving barefooted is that it is not illegal. While it is true that driving without shoes is considered to be dangerous, as it may cause the driver to slip or lose control of the pedals, it is not a violation of the law. The focus of the police officer in this scenario is likely on more serious offenses such as reckless driving, speeding, or impaired driving, rather than on the footwear of the driver. This means that, even though the other driver pointed out that Jack was driving barefooted, the police officer did not issue a ticket as there was no violation of the law in this case.
Plsss help with this question I’ll mark u as brainlist
Which of the following distances must a driver be able to see oncoming traffic in order to make a legal U-turn?
1 100 feet
2 500 yards
3 500 feet
4 200 yards
the answer is 500 feet not 99% sure
What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? (Select all that apply.) Responses To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct by preventing the use of illegally obtained evidence during a criminal trial.
What is evidence?Evidence is any type of proof that is used to support a claim or conclusion. It can be physical, such as an object or document, or it can be testimonial, such as a witness providing a statement. Evidence is often used in legal proceedings to prove a point of law or fact. It can also be used in scientific research to support or refute a hypothesis. Evidence can also be used in everyday life to support an argument or decision. In any situation, evidence should be reliable, relevant, and sufficient to support the claim or conclusion.
This rule ensures that police do not arrest people without a legal cause, that evidence is collected legally, and that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. Additionally, it ensures that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
To learn more about evidence
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ1