Answer:
have lost a sense of judgment and self-control and have slight impairment of balance, speech, vision.
How many justices are required for a case to proceed to a hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court? a six b five c four
d three
Four justices are required for a case to proceed to a hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court. Thus, option C is correct.
The supreme court of the United States operates with the Nine justices. These nine justices are selected by the President of the U.S. and they will be confirmed by the Senate of the court. They can serve for their lifetime and they can resign at any time or until removed from court.
In the Supreme Court of the U.S., only four justices are required to grant a writ of certiorari. This writ of certiorari is an order in which Supreme Court reviews all the cases from the lower court and gives the better decision.
To learn more about Supreme Court
https://brainly.com/question/31146664
#SPJ4
A police officer may operate an authorized emergency vehicle for a law enforcement purpose without using the audible or visual signals required by Section 546.003 if the officer is:
(1) responding to an emergency call or pursuing a suspected violator of the law with probable cause to believe that:
(A) knowledge of the presence of the officer will cause the suspect to:
(i) destroy or lose ___________ of a suspected felony;
(ii) end a suspected continuing felony before the officer has obtained sufficient evidence to establish grounds for arrest; or
(iii) ____________ apprehension or identification of the suspect or the suspect's vehicle;
(1) responding to an emergency call or pursuing a suspected violator of the law with probable cause to believe that:
(A) knowledge of the presence of the officer will cause the suspect to:
(i) destroy or lose evidence of a suspected felony;
(ii) end a suspected continuing felony before the officer has obtained sufficient evidence to establish grounds for arrest; or
(iii) hinder apprehension or identification of the suspect or the suspect's vehicle.
The american law institute established the law model penal code to unife criminal law across tge 50 states. how many staes have adopted the entire code
As per the cutoff in September 2021, not all 50 states in the United States have adopted the entire Model Penal Code (MPC) The entire Model Penal Code (MPC) was established by the American Law Institute (ALI).
The MPC is a comprehensive model code that seeks to harmonize criminal laws across jurisdictions and provide a framework for the revision and development of criminal statutes.
Whereas the MPC has been persuasive in forming criminal laws and has been received in shifting degrees by diverse states, it is vital to note that the selection of the complete code isn't widespread. A few states have received parts or areas of the MPC, whereas others have not received it at all.
The degree of appropriation and joining of the MPC's provisions shifts from state to state, and there's no definitive number of states that have embraced the whole code. A few states may have consolidated considerable parcels of the MPC into their criminal statutes, whereas others have made more restricted appropriations or alterations.
To learn about Model Penal Code visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31667549
#SPJ4
Describe how the Due process clause of the 14th amendment affects the guarantees in the Bill of Rights
Answer:
before the government may deprive someone of “life, liberty, or property.” In other words, the Clause does not prohibit the government from depriving someone of “substantive” rights such as life, liberty, or property; it simply requires that the government follow ...
Constitutional Interpretations of Federalism
Explain how the appropriate balance of power between national and
state governments has been interpreted differently over time.
The interpretation of the applicable balance of power between public and state governments has been a contentious issue since the confirmation of the United States.
Over time, different interpretations have surfaced, reflecting changing political and social conditions, as well as evolving legal and indigenous principle
originally, the interpretation of federalism during the early times of the country was dominated by a strict constructionist view, which emphasized the limited powers of the public government and the sovereignty of the countries.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Supreme Court espoused a more restrictive interpretation of civil power, striking down numerous civil laws and regulations as unconstitutional intrusions into state sovereignty.
In the late half of the 20th century, the Supreme Court shifted back towards a further extensive interpretation of civil power, upholding civil laws and regulations in areas similar as civil rights, environmental protection, and commerce.
Now, the applicable balance of power between public and state governments remains a contentious and evolving issue, with different interpretations depending on the political and legal environment.
Learn more about Federalism :-
https://brainly.com/question/2871279
#SPJ4
What is a discussion for the contemporary of the criminal justice system
Answer:
The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals include the rehabilitation of offenders, preventing other crimes, and moral support for victims. The primary institutions of the criminal justice system are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and prisons.
The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals include the rehabilitation of offenders, preventing other crimes, and moral support for victims. The primary institutions of the criminal justice system are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and prisons.
Answer:
Explanation:
Is it illegal to videotape someone without their consent.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
black inmates are attacked more than inmates of any other race
Answer:
False.
Explaination:
The set of criteria that courts have developed to avoid generation of First Amendment problems by time, place, and manner restrictions are called _____.
The set of criteria that courts have developed to avoid the generation of First Amendment problems by time, place, and manner restrictions are called the "time, place, and manner test.
" The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects citizens' rights to free speech, assembly, and religion. However, these rights are not absolute, and some restrictions may be necessary in certain situations.
To ensure that time, place, and manner restrictions on speech do not violate the First Amendment, courts have developed a three-part test. First, the restriction must be content-neutral; that is, it cannot target specific types of speech or viewpoints. Second, the restriction must serve a significant government interest, such as protecting public safety or preserving the aesthetic character of a neighborhood. Finally, the restriction must leave ample alternative channels for communication.
The time, place, and manner test applies to various forms of speech, including protests, demonstrations, and other public gatherings. For example, a city may require protestors to obtain a permit before holding a rally in a public park. To pass muster under the time, place, and manner test, such a restriction must be content-neutral, serve a significant government interest, and leave ample alternative channels for communication.
Overall, the time, place, and manner test strikes a balance between protecting individuals' rights to free speech and ensuring that public safety and other important government interests are also protected. By applying this test, courts can determine whether restrictions on time, place, and manner of speech are constitutional and avoid potential conflicts with the First Amendment.
learn more about Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ11
7
You are watching a movie about ancient Rome when a scene of a court case appears. You see that the court hearing is being held outside around
the town square or market. What can you reasonably infer about this case?
O A
O B.
OC.
O D.
The court case was about a minor offense.
The accused was a part of the elite class.
A corporeal punishment was about to be given.
The case involved a violent crime.
If the court hearing is being held outside around the town square or market then the court case was about a minor offense.
Roman legal procedure was a long-evolving system utilised in Roman courts that eventually served as the foundation for contemporary procedure in nations with civil law. There were three major, overlapping phases of development: the legis actiones, which lasted from the late 2nd century BCE until the end of the 5th century BCE law code known as the Twelve Tables; the formulary system; and the cognitio extraordinaria, which was in use during the post-Classical period. The legis actiones procedure was broken down into multiple phases.
To know more about Civil Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1
In a successful civil RICO action, what civil remedies are available to the prevailing party?
allow the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages).
wikipedia
megan goes to visit her friend kathleen. while visiting, megan downloads kathleen's copy of photoshop onto her computer's random access memory without kathleen's permission. megan is guilty of
Megan is guilty of unauthorized reproduction or copying of Kathleen's copy of Photoshop without permission.
In the scenario described, Megan downloaded Kathleen's copy of Photoshop onto her computer's random access memory (RAM) without Kathleen's consent. This action constitutes unauthorized reproduction or copying of the software. Copyright law grants the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute a copyrighted work to the copyright owner, in this case, Kathleen.
By downloading and copying Kathleen's copy of Photoshop onto her computer's RAM, Megan has violated Kathleen's exclusive rights as the copyright owner. Even though the copy was not permanently saved on Megan's computer, the act of reproducing the software in the computer's memory is still considered a form of unauthorized copying. Copyright infringement can occur even without a permanent copy being made.
Unauthorized reproduction or copying is one of the central aspects of copyright infringement. To legally use copyrighted software like Photoshop, individuals typically need to obtain the necessary licenses or permissions from the copyright owner. In this case, Megan's actions of downloading and copying the software without Kathleen's permission constitute a violation of Kathleen's rights.
It's important to note that copyright laws may vary between jurisdictions, and the specific circumstances and applicable laws can affect the legal consequences of copyright infringement. However, in general, Megan's act of downloading and copying Kathleen's copy of Photoshop onto her computer's RAM without permission falls within the scope of unauthorized reproduction, which is a form of copyright infringement.
Learn more about permission here
https://brainly.com/question/30318894
#SPJ11
Help, please
40 points I am giving and please give the right answer it is a simple question
Answer: I believe this is the correct answer.
Which of the following characteristics was just recently established (since June 2020) as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964? National origin Race Sexual orientation Sex 10:09 AM Religion
The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.
Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:
https://brainly.com/question/1172086
#SPJ11
Should local police departments work with federal agencies to enforce immigration policies? Why or
why not?
Answer:
No, because local law enforcement has other priorities especially to protect the people of their community, by adding extra task to local law enforcement would obstruct how they respond to local issues and apply more stress that they already have.
complaint includes a short statement of facts that show the party filing the complaint is legally entitled to a remedy. True False
The given statement "complaint includes a short statement of facts that show the party filing the complaint is legally entitled to a remedy" is true the party gets the appropriate justice and relief.
A complaint is any official legal document that outlines the facts and legal justifications (see: cause of action) that the party or parties filing the complaint (the plaintiff(s)) believe are sufficient to support a claim against the party(s) against whom the claim is brought (the defendant(s)), entitling the plaintiff(s) to a remedy (either monetary damages or injunctive relief). For instance, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), which set the rules for civil litigation in US courts, state that a civil action is started by the filing or service of a pleading known as a complaint. The same term is used for the same pleading under civil court rules in states that have incorporated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
To know more about complaint here
https://brainly.com/question/4911295
#SPJ4
Which of these is an economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law?
A workers are guaranteed a certain income
B. Employers are encouraged to hire more workers
C. Employers are required to train more workers
D. Workers are allowed to organize into unions
Answer: B
Explanation:
The economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law can be summarized, as workers being guaranteed a certain income. Hence, Option (A) is correct.
This means that employers must pay their employees at least the minimum wage, providing workers with a baseline level of compensation.
By ensuring that workers receive a certain income, the minimum wage law helps to protect them from extremely low wages and potential exploitation.
It establishes a basic standard of living and provides economic security for workers, particularly those in low-wage jobs.
Thus, this economic benefit aims to improve workers' financial well-being and reduce poverty rates by setting a floor on wages in the labor market.
Learn more about minimum wage law here:
https://brainly.com/question/31859230
#SPJ2
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
what do you think about the differences between the common law and
the UCC rules on offers and acceptances? Can you think of an
example where you might have madr offer forming a contract?
In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.
In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.
Read more about common law at
https://brainly.com/question/31657506
#SPJ4
What conflict exists when an mco provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests
A conflicts of Interest & Accountability can occur when a when a MCOs provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests.
What is the role of the MCOs?The Managed Care Organizations is an entity that provides financial incentives such as bonuses to physicians for reducing the number of tests, treatments and referrals to hospitals and specialists.
Therefore, the conflicts of Interest & Accountability can occur when a when a MCOs provides bonuses to physicians for providing fewer tests.
Read more about MCOs
brainly.com/question/27034009
#SPJ1
Write a response discussing the traumas that victims of crime experience and ways that these traumas might be best addressed.
Answer: The victims or trauma experience unimaginable traumas, physically, and mentally. PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) is the most common disorders that crime victims experience. PTSD causes anxiety, paranoia, and flashbacks triggered by some things.
Conpensation is basically just paying people for their troubles, while they still struggle mentally in situations.
https://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/reports/firstrep/bgavoc.html this site should help , the first paragraph explains it well.
As though teaching a class, explain mouth-to-mouth resuscitation in approximately 150 words.
Reanimation using mouth-to-mouth Breathe normally, then shut and seal their open mouth with yours before blowing into it briefly. When you breathe into their lips, their chest ought to clearly lift.
How can mouth-to-mouth resuscitation be started?Use the head-tilt, chin-lift method to widen the airway. Squeeze the nostrils tightly and place your mouth over the other person's to create a seal in order to breathe mouth-to-mouth. Before checking to see if the chest rises, perform a one-second rescue breath on the subject. If it rises, you should breathe out again.
What do you mean by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation equipment?a personal mouth-to-mouth resuscitation device. The device has a plastic film barrier, with a one-way valve covering their lips. on the victim's face, if possible.
To know more about Resuscitation visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/6335546
#SPJ1
What is Rule 15 of NC Rules of Civil Procedure?
Rule 15 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure concerns amending pleadings. Specifically, it allows a party to amend its pleadings at any time before a responsive pleading is served, or, if no responsive pleading is required, within 30 days of service of the pleading to be amended.
After that time, a party may only amend its pleadings by written consent of the opposing party or by leave of court. The rule also provides that leave to amend should be freely given when justice so requires, but that the court may consider factors such as undue delay, prejudice to the opposing party, and futility of the proposed amendment in deciding whether to grant leave to amend.
Learn more about North Carolina Rules
https://brainly.com/question/31276773
#SPJ4
The Court Packing Plan was an attempt by President Roosevelt to expand the number of justices to the supreme court. The expansion of justices however would only take place if the justices had the same views as Roosevelt thus assisting him with passing his own agenda. The New Deal were a series of program by Roosevelt to bring about economic growth after the stock market crash. Much of these provisions however were decided in the supreme court which provide motivation to Roosevelt to Pack the Court. Much of the New Deal faced challenges and many of the justice department officials opposed the legislature. Roosevelt issued a proposal stating that any judge over 70 should retire with full pay thus leading the way to a majority vote. Both sides congress opposed the court packing plan that Roosevelt presented.
The Court Packing Plan was an attempt by the President Roosevelt in order to expand the number of justices to the Supreme Court.
There was a bill which came to be known as Roosevelt's "Court-Packing Plan", which is a phrase coined by the Edward Rumely. In November 1936, President Roosevelt was said to have won a sweeping re-election victory. So, he proposed to reorganize the federal judiciary.
However, this act was done by adding a new justice each time a justice reached age 70 and failed to retire. Thus, during his 12 years in office, Roosevelt appointed 8 new members of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Hence, Roosevelt decided in order to curb the power of the Supreme Court.
To learn more about the Court-Packing Plan here:
https://brainly.com/question/3950000
#SPJ4
Five features of Federalism
Explanation:
features of federalism are
1 there are two or more level of government
2different tires of government the same citizen but each tier has its own jurisdiction specific matter of Legislature and taxation and administration
3 the level of jurisdiction of the respective level of or two tires of government are specified in the constitution so that existence and authority of each tier of government is constitutionally granted
4 the fundamental provisions of the Constitution cannot be an literally changed by one level of the government such changes required the contest of both level of government
5 sources of revenue for each level of government clearly specialised to ensure its financial authority
I hope it will help you
please mark answer as a brainliest answer
thank you
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
In the early King's Court of England, a court of law could grant as a remedy only
a. an injunction.
b. a judicial proceeding for the resolution of a dispute.
c. an order to perform a contract as promised.
d. damages.
In the early King's Court of England, a court of law could grant as a remedy only damages.
Below you can read more about Damages.
What are Damages?In law, damages refers to monetary benefits which are paid to a claimant as a means of compensation for loss or injury.
Most times, damages are paid when a party breaches an agreement or in a case where the right of a person is violated.
Damages are broadly categorized into three major forms and they include the following;
economic damagesnon-economic damagespunitive damages.Therefore, according to the question, a remedy can be granted by the King's court of England in form of Damages.
Learn more about Damages at https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ1
It should be noted that in the early King's Court of England, a court of law could grant as a remedy only as C. Damages.
How to illustrate the information?Damages are monetary payments made to a claimant as recompense for loss or harm in the legal sense. Damages are typically paid when one party violates another's rights or when an agreement is broken.
Economic, non-economic, and punitive damages are the three main types of damages that can be generally defined. The courts of law could initially only award monetary remedies due to historical and political factors in the creation of the English legal system. A different equity system had to be used if the petitioner requested something other than money. There were distinct courtrooms and hearings for each.
Therefore, it hould be noted that in the early King's Court of England, a court of law could grant as a remedy only as damages.
In conclusion, the correct option is D.
Learn more about court on:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ1
50. If the solid yellow line is on your right, you are driving:
A.
in a safe manner
B.
on the correct side of the road
C.
on the wrong side of the road
If the solid yellow line is on your right, you're driving: A. in a secure manner
Driving is the controlled operation and movement of an automobile, such as vehicles, bikes, vans, buses, and bicycles. Permission to drive on public highways is granted based totally on a fixed of situations being met and drivers are required to observe the installed avenue and traffic legal guidelines within the region they are driving.
Definition of driving: communicating force a using wheel. b: exerting pressure on a user to have an effect. 2a: having extraordinary pressure a riding rain a driving beat. b: acting with vigor: lively a hard-using worker.
The motive of driving. riding serves many functions. At its most fundamental degree, using a motor automobile is a reliable, green, and inexpensive mode of shipping. using a vehicle may be as smooth as going for walks or strolling once you get cozy at the back of the wheel. For this, you want to practice difficult, keep in thought all the guidelines and traffic laws and familiarize yourself well with the vehicle.
Learn more about driving here: https://brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ9
Identify two reasons why you agree or disagree with structural functionalism
-Sociology
Answer:
Other criticisms leveled at structural functionalism from a variety of theoretical perspectives were that it was based on faulty analogies between societies and biological organisms; that it was tautological, teleological, or excessively abstract; that its conception of social change as an adaptive response.Explanation:
mark as brainliastindian genius sarthakThe environmental policy act of 1969 was instituted as a follow up regulation to major environmental issues that occurred in the 1960’s.
Answer:
That's correct! The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 was passed in response to growing concern about the impact of human activities on the environment. The act established a national policy to protect the environment and created the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to advise the president on environmental matters.